<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redesigns: ESPN.com vs. Cyclingnews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kadisco.com/2009/01/redesigns-espncom-vs-cyclingnews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/01/redesigns-espncom-vs-cyclingnews/</link>
	<description>Perhaps you&#039;re interested.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monday bike news - Cult of the Bicycle</title>
		<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/01/redesigns-espncom-vs-cyclingnews/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday bike news - Cult of the Bicycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kadisco.com/?p=690#comment-687</guid>
		<description>[...] that began January hit the mainstream media over the weekend and became kind of big news.Kadisco on sports websites redesigns. See also this interesting bit about cycling team sponsorship budgets: while global sports team [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that began January hit the mainstream media over the weekend and became kind of big news.Kadisco on sports websites redesigns. See also this interesting bit about cycling team sponsorship budgets: while global sports team [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/01/redesigns-espncom-vs-cyclingnews/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kadisco.com/?p=690#comment-674</guid>
		<description>1. The move to IAB standard ad sizes means that advertisers can use the same creative on CN that they use on any other site on the web. 

2. CN&#039;s parent company is an international publisher that has relationships with major brands and agencies, and can traffic ads across dozens of websites.

It&#039;s not a stretch to think that non-endemic ads will be running on Cyclingnews sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The move to IAB standard ad sizes means that advertisers can use the same creative on CN that they use on any other site on the web. </p>
<p>2. CN&#8217;s parent company is an international publisher that has relationships with major brands and agencies, and can traffic ads across dozens of websites.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a stretch to think that non-endemic ads will be running on Cyclingnews sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wil m</title>
		<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/01/redesigns-espncom-vs-cyclingnews/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>wil m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kadisco.com/?p=690#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis, as always.

I look forward to the day when publishers like Future and Competitor (VN) have even a third of the budget ESPN can muster for a redesign. We&#039;ll see that day coming when the ads on cyclingnews migrate from small third-party parts makers to national consumer brands. 
Considering that cyclingnews isn&#039;t even able to sell their own leaderboard, that day may be a long time coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis, as always.</p>
<p>I look forward to the day when publishers like Future and Competitor (VN) have even a third of the budget ESPN can muster for a redesign. We&#8217;ll see that day coming when the ads on cyclingnews migrate from small third-party parts makers to national consumer brands.<br />
Considering that cyclingnews isn&#8217;t even able to sell their own leaderboard, that day may be a long time coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
