<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking traditional sponsorship measurement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kadisco.com/2009/09/debunking-traditional-sponsorship-evaluation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/09/debunking-traditional-sponsorship-evaluation/</link>
	<description>Perhaps you&#039;re interested.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A winged horse teaches us about sponsorship and funding &#124; Kadisco: Cycling, Marketing, Sponsorship, Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/09/debunking-traditional-sponsorship-evaluation/comment-page-1/#comment-5251</link>
		<dc:creator>A winged horse teaches us about sponsorship and funding &#124; Kadisco: Cycling, Marketing, Sponsorship, Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kadisco.com/?p=1400#comment-5251</guid>
		<description>[...] spends money to associate its brand with a cycling team. The team provides media exposure (which is bullshit but whatever), opportunities for corporate hospitality, etc. It&#8217;s advertising, and it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spends money to associate its brand with a cycling team. The team provides media exposure (which is bullshit but whatever), opportunities for corporate hospitality, etc. It&#8217;s advertising, and it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kadisco: Cycling, Marketing, Sponsorship, Social Media &#124; Cycling sponsorship: The short answer</title>
		<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/09/debunking-traditional-sponsorship-evaluation/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>Kadisco: Cycling, Marketing, Sponsorship, Social Media &#124; Cycling sponsorship: The short answer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kadisco.com/?p=1400#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>[...] Debunking traditional sponsorship measurement  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debunking traditional sponsorship measurement  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boulder Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interbike Approacheth</title>
		<link>http://www.kadisco.com/2009/09/debunking-traditional-sponsorship-evaluation/comment-page-1/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Boulder Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interbike Approacheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kadisco.com/?p=1400#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>[...] few people picked up on that, mostly to point out - fairly enough - that the valuation is kind of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few people picked up on that, mostly to point out &#8211; fairly enough &#8211; that the valuation is kind of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

